This section contains information sheets, article links, lawsuit info and videos about SB4. Check back here often to see updated news and information.
General Information
GENERAL INFORMATION & RESOURCES ON SB4
MALDEF Update on Status of SB4 Appeals Court Decision – Sept. 25, 2017
- What is the status of SB4 after this court decision?
- SB4 banned local officials and employees from criticizing current immigration enforcement, including SB4 itself. The part of SB4 that restricted free speech is blocked. Local officials and employees can criticize SB4, and criticize current immigration enforcement, without fear of being punished.
- SB4 tried to give local police officers authority to enforce immigration law. The court decided that cities and counties can adopt policies that limit police officers from asking immigration questions and assisting ICE. Although cities and counties cannot ban their officers from asking immigration questions or assisting ICE, localities can set priorities and adopt other policies that limit these activities.
- SB4 required local jails to comply with all ICE detainer requests (also known as immigration holds). The court decided that SB4 “does not require detention pursuant to every ICE detainer request.” The court explained that a jail should cooperate in a way that follows the law and ICE practice. This means that a jail can refuse a detainer request if cooperation would create a legal problem or if the detainer does not follow ICE practice.
- Where are we in this case?
- The court decision of September 25, 2017 is temporary. The case is still in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and there will be further arguments during the week of November 6, 2017. We can expect the next court decision after early November.
- What does all of this mean?
- Texas does not have the SB4 that it wanted. The courts have blocked some parts of SB4 and scaled back other parts.
- Local officials and employees can criticize current immigration enforcement and debate alternative policies without fear of punishment;
- Cities and counties can adopt policies that limit immigration questioning and enforcement by their police officers;
- Local jails cannot be forced to comply with 100% of ICE detainers. Jails must review detainers and can refuse detainers for legal reasons.
- Texas does not have the SB4 that it wanted. The courts have blocked some parts of SB4 and scaled back other parts.
- What can we do to help?
- You can make your voice heard in the court by joining a “friend of the court” (amicus) legal brief before October 26, 2017. You can also advocate in your city and county for local policies that promote public safety and community trust.
- Who can I contact at MALDEF?
- For more information about SB4 or your legal rights, contact MALDEF Staff Attorney Fátima Menéndez at fmenendez@maldef.org.
- 5 Things to Know about SB-4
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/texas-sb4-immigration-enforcement-law-5-things-know-n758126- Not just police who will enforce immigration
- Encourages city council members, county commissions/ local governing bodies, Sherriff’s, city attorney’s and district attorney’s office and police on campuses of colleges and universities.
- County officials and campus police can’t stand in the way of immigration enforcement
- Prohibits and government entity from forbidding to check immigration status
- Officials can be removed for not complying with the law
- Any elected or appointed official can be fired if found to “materially limit” or prohibits cooperation with immigration officials
- Class A misdemeanor charges- can be charged anywhere from $1000 -$25,000 and $25,000 after that
- Officials who do not cooperate could be seen as obstructing police officer from immigration law enforcement
- Encourages people to turn in their local government or university officials
- Can turn in an employer who is not following the law
- Victims and witnesses can be asked about their immigration status
- Officers must have probable cause to believe witness of victim committed another crime
- It promises to defend those who are sued for complying with the law
- 4th amendment legal challenges- not allowed to detain someone beyond their release date
- Not just police who will enforce immigration
- Sanctuary, Safety and The Community
http://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/Sanctuary%20Cities%20English_0.pdf - SB4 and the history of racist laws in Texas
http://aldianews.com/articles/politics/anti-sanctuary-cities-bill-sb4-builds-history-racism-texas/48500 - SB4 and Anti-Human Rights Law
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/5/15/1662583/-Texas-SB4-Is-Not-Just-an-Anti-Sanctuary-Law-It-s-an-Anti-Human-Rights-Law
- MALDEF Lawsuit
http://www.maldef.org/news/releases/tx_school_funding/
https://www.maldef.org/assets/pdf/SB4lawsuit.pdf - City of Cenizo Lawsuit Info:
http://www.ksat.com/news/federal-government-supports-texas-in-sb-4-lawsuit - Cities of San Antonio, Austin and Dallas have officially joined the lawsuit
supporting El Cenizo
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/06/01/san-antonio-austin-suing-texas-over-immigration-law/ - San Antonio Sues over SB4
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/06/01/san-antonio-austin-suing-texas-over-immigration-law/
Lawsuit states that it violates the 1st, 4th and 14th amendments of the constitution- 1st amendment – by threatening anyone who (appointed or elected officials) endorses any policy that counter-acts this legislation or speaks about limiting local law enforcement on immigration issues
- 4th amendment – by detaining in jail and having these jails comply with immigration detainers which would be an unreasonable searches and seizures; SB4 makes them all mandatory seizures some which are based on probable cause and some are not which makes it unconstitutional (since they are mandatory)
- 14th – violates the equal protection clause of the 14th
- What you need to know about the SB4 ruling (from ACLU)
English One Page
Spanish One Page - Process of SB4 (power point of steps taken to get to SB4)
https://communityimpact.com/austin/at-the-capitol/2017/05/03/sanctuary-city-legislation-where-is-texas-going-and-how-did-state-get-here/ - ACLU Impact Sheet
https://texasimpact.org/sites/default/files/Site-Materials/Weekly-Witness/Handouts/2017-04-ACLU-SB-4-fact-sheet.pdf